我们算了下，《狂飙》竟然怒刷了120条热搜******
中新网2月2日电 2023开年爆款剧《狂飙》2月1日晚迎来大结局。不过，《狂飙》的热度并没因剧情的终结就此打住，反而在剧集落幕24小时后依旧霸榜热搜。
截至2日10时30分，话题#狂飙#依旧排在实况热聊榜首位，受到广泛讨论。社交媒体热搜榜上前50的话题中，有超过三成的在榜词条都与其有关，如#张颂文 我永远难忘这个春节# #安欣再送饺子 高启强再举杯# #安长林 好人# #狂飙全员发博告别角色#等话题都轮番占据高位。
主演张颂文在大结局播出后，第一时间在微博上发出的感慨小作文，互动数已突破100万。文娱榜上，前三位的热搜词条都被《狂飙》相关话题占据。
此前《狂飙》热播期间，脱口秀演员徐志胜就曾发文感叹：“看完狂飙之前不看微博了，热搜怎么老剧透啊？”可见《狂飙》相关内容在热搜榜单上出现的频率，在剧集完结之后，网友对其“大事小情”的关注、讨论和“剧透”更是达到了高潮。
据统计，目前直接以“狂飙”为关键字的热搜词条已达18条。以剧中主要角色为关键词，已有与“安欣”相关的热搜22条，以“高启强”为关键字的热搜词条16条，与“陈书婷”“大嫂”“李响”“高启盛”“高启兰”“安长林”等角色相关的热搜话题超过60条。
加上小编写稿时仍然像“打地鼠”般不时冒头的新热搜，不完全统计——一共超过了120条！
其中，从与剧情相关的#狂飙大结局预告# #狂飙全员be# #安欣再送饺子 高启强再举杯# #安欣和高启强说了同一句谎话#到分析讨论剧情的#狂飙最大保护伞# #高启强有多恨高晓晨#，从#狂飙口型对不上# #狂飙导演回应吃肠粉不加酱油#等镜头细节，再到#狂飙大结局后的第一天# #狂飙的艺术总监是张译# #狂飙张彪演员真当过警察#等戏外话题，与剧集相关的每一个细节都能引起一波热议。
不仅如此，在网友火眼金睛的“深挖”下，也有话题逐渐“失控”，包括由网图演变产生的话题#安欣准备卧底当大嫂#，到关注“大嫂”造型的#高叶陈书婷妆教# 甚至陈书婷口红、陈书婷穿搭等话题热度都居高不下，“狂飙”话题逐渐破圈。
《狂飙》为什么会在社交媒体平台如此炸裂？一直将这部剧从头追到尾的刘小姐的分析，或许具有很强的代表性：《狂飙》剧情硬核，节奏鲜明，角色鲜活，演员给力。从开播我就在跟这部剧，因为过年停更那几天，整个人都觉得空荡荡的，满脑子都在想“强哥如何做大做强”。
目前，仍有如#张颂文已经有站姐了# #高叶拍狂飙整整痛苦了两三个月# 等新热搜词条不断涌现。以至于网友感叹：“《狂飙》大结局后的第一天，后劲真的太大了！”
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
